[Youtube Review][Veritasium] 자율 주행 차량의 진정한 윤리적 딜레마

(Recommended)Popular Videos : [Veritasium] 자율 주행 차량의 진정한 윤리적 딜레마

 

This time, I will review the popular YouTube videos.

These days, even if it's good to watch on YouTube, sometimes people skip it or don't watch it if it's too long.

When you watch Youtube, do you scroll and read the comments first?

To save your busy time, why don't you check out the fun contents, summary, and empathy comments of popular YouTube videos first and watch YouTube?

(Recommended)Popular Videos : [Veritasium] 자율 주행 차량의 진정한 윤리적 딜레마

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WBjY3QGNdAw

 

---

 

Playtime Comments : [Veritasium] 자율 주행 차량의 진정한 윤리적 딜레마

Ai****:

1:38 I love how it being an autonomous BMW is doubleparking right there :D

Bo*********:

Featuring a tiny glimpse into who films these vids for Derrick (2:43).

Th*****************:

2:55 oof that didn't age well. I guess this was made before the days of 737 Max. Also did the 'Study' forget that Cpt Sully exists?

hu*:

3:30 + 420

Au************:

so with the ethical question it showed, 1:34
What would an actual human choose
the fact that it had to ask what to choose makes it clear its not easy for humans to solve it, so why are we making machines do it for us? they said, what should a machine choose but the real question is what should a human choose? and what would they choose

On*******:

I love the 420 on the logo at 3:30

Sh**************:

The real moral dilemma is how you can see the camera woman at @2:50

To***********:

Hey Derek, just curious, what's your source for "airplanes flying in full autonomous mode are actually safer - studies show - than when pilots take control" at 2:55?

Su**********:

At 0:09 Electronics is spelled wrong (unless you're using Las Vegas English, I suppose)

Jo*******:

I love driving the vehicle myself. The only time that I will used self driving car is during traffic, and after 10:30pm at night.

 

---

 

Top Comments : [Veritasium] 자율 주행 차량의 진정한 윤리적 딜레마

Ev************:

I just now noticed that the atomic number of Veritasium is 42.0 (420).

I find that Amusing.

Ka*********:

2:11 "We're using our phones"

What do you mean, "we"? That super cool douchebag there is using his phone.

te*******:

I'm fifty-two. I'm hoping that by the time I am no longer safe to drive a car, my car can drive itself.

Ja**:

That was a pretty cheap conclusion. I thought he'd talk about tradeoff between risk aversion and speed. In the future it's entirely possible for "jailbroken" cars - or different safety preferences to compromise everyone else in the road. Being autonomous also requires uniformity

Be********:

2013 - 300,000 subs , 2017 almost 4 mil subs ... U guys have come a long way <3 god bless

da************:

GUUUUUURL I want a self-driving Tesla.

Ek********:

Veritasium

An element of marketing disguised as content.

Al****************:

I completely concur with all that is said in this video. Concerns over how a computer might juggle the choices between, as the thinking goes, it will prioritise when endangering 3rd parties, is unrealistic - i dont suppose any algorithm will be based on 'whom should i kill first?'. It also overlooks the fact that such decisions are already being made, by humans.

My only concern about autonomous cars is that it will lead to me being excluded from having a right to drive at all, on the basis that you cant trust humans.

wi********:

Being a very old guy, I understand intellectually that letting the car drive itself would be better, but I don't think I could ever trust it.

Fu******:

It usually takes the smartest guy in the room to point at the most obvious thing...

Po********:

Waiting for the first "no human-driven vehicle allowed past this point" sign

Da*********:

I can picture my future children asking me what it was like to drive a car.

Si****:

Spot on.
This goes for medicine and tech developments in general I believe.
Where I live in Europe for example we have incredibly strict rules for the pharmaceutical industry. So strict in fact that the cost of development and the delay in getting new medicine out on the marker are killing a lot of people that are in need.
I get why its this way. Its a huge tragedy when unforeseen effects pop up after market introduction. It can sink a company. Any company.
But we need a larger perspective in our political discourse. We have overemphasized safety to the point of negligence.

Wa**************:

I wanted to see what the car would do in a Real moral dilemma, hit the car to the left or kill the guy on the motorcycle to the right.

ab*:

Posted 1 second ago and on my recommended list.

Ch***********:

The interesting part about these questions and scenarios is I have yet to see anyone take into account that, unlike people who can't watch every sector within their field of view autonomous vehicles come with several specialized cameras designed to watch 360 degrees around a car at distances farther than a person can see and pay attention all at the same time thus being capable of seeing things that could potentially signal an accident happening (in other words predicting a possible accident), all this while being programmed to drive as a person is supposed to, a proper speeds, with proper distance from the vehicle in front, with nearly up to date maps and GPS and potentially programmed with how stop lights are programmed thus avoiding running red lights or even catching one.

Basically an autonomous vehicle can (or is supposed to be able to) see more than we can, all at once, without distractions, combining this data with the preprogrammed traffic rules, maps, traffic light settings and updated traffic warnings all analyzed is seconds and thus these scenarios can be avoided almost entirely.

Granted like any other new tech there will be bugs and thus these scenarios will happen but it's expected to have extremely low rates of happening and if it does then at this point the vehicle may not be able to make a choice, moral or otherwise because I think the scenario would have to be extreme enough that even a computer won't be able to react in time.

And if by chance a chance was to be made I think the autonomous vehicle should not risk others lives for the sake of saving the passenger. The vehicle should just take the hit and hope all the data gathered right before the accident will allow it to react in a way that can save the passenger and potentially prevent any hard or serious harm.

That's what I think is the way it should work even with the level of testing we have today.

sh********:

The "ethical dilemmas" presented by "technologist" and "ethical experts" are often false dilemmas.

Cars are being programmed to avoid putting the car in a situation it cannot avoid or mitigate a frontal collision. If it is unavoidable (say because the vehicle in front has much better brakes) the car brakes as much as it can and prepares for impact. It won't change lanes to hit another or escalate an impact or accident by involving others.

Ke**********:

The idea of autonomous cars used to scare me. Then one day I was driving to work and glanced over to see the driver next to me changing his pants while driving! A few days after that I saw another driver reading a freaking newspaper while driving!

Those two instances crystallized in my mind the reality that most people don't like driving and would rather not do it. Sure, they love the freedom of movement it offers, but they don't like actually driving. They would rather be changing their pants, or reading a newspaper, or texting their bff, but instead they have to drive right now so they "compromise" and do those things WHILE they drive.

A computer by contrast may make slightly worse decisions in a pinch (though I'm not even convinced of this anymore), but it doesn't have anything better to do than drive. The computer driving your autonomous car will never be distracted by its pants, the newspaper, or its bff. It will pay attention to the road and only the road, and so even if its decisions are otherwise not quite as good as yours would be (which, again, I'm no longer convinced is the case) it will still have fewer accidents.

Me********:

Yea great, go to the pub get blind drunk and tell the car to take you home!

Ka***********:

It like what CGP Grey said:
"It doesn't have to be good, it just has to be better than us. "

Pa*******:

I liked the way YouTube showed it was a paid promotion, it was apparent, but not obtrusive.

Ma*****:

It's facinating how peopole are unwilling to have a machine make decisions for them even when proved it is safer.

Sh*************:

"Hey wanna drive our self driving BMW?"

mi********:

The other real dilemma is do we want other people to be able to remotely control where we go and if we die.

There are evil and insane people that are not only computer hackers, but also are members of Corporations and government or official representatives of those very institutions ruthlessly and acting their agendas.

Li**********:

why aren't we getting them on the road faster? because the technology is far from being there.

Fe******:

I'm afraid that in the future, when autonomous vehicles will prove they can save lives, politicians might start thinking about making driving a motor vehicle illegal, because "its too dangerous". If that ever happens, I'm going to jail, because I'll never stop driving.

ky*****:

it only takes one coding error, one bug, one hacker, for 10 million self driving cars to crash

Sa*************:

I love this! I saw the books on a wee shelf in the backseat. I used to say my dream car was a cube with an easy chair, WiFi, and just my voice telling the thing where to go. (Of course, LTE is now good enough I don't need the WiFi.)

Also, I think the "right" answer to the "moral dilemma" was to slow down without swerving. This would cause the least harm and best chance of preventing injury all around. Like this case, most of these "moral dilemmas" are either totally rubbish or bizzare edge cases that they should not prevent us from moving forward as there are so many lives at stake in the real world.

That said, I'd love to see how self driving cars do in inclement weather, especially snow!

me************:

In a different video, you talk about thinking and Drew's inability to hold too many pieces of information. As a middle school teacher, I've had students ask if they can us the calculator, and I always say no. Because we know that young children need to learn calculations so well that it becomes automatic. Every year, to prove my point, I would challenge a student to come up with a multiple digit multiplication problem. Another student and I would race; he/she would use a calculator and I would do it in my head. I almost always won. But I also practice. I know; I'm a geek. My point here is that if we allow drivers, especially young ones but really any age, to release their responsibility to the vehicle, then those people will lose the ability to analyze road conditions and make smart choices. I predict that we'll see this first with lane departure warnings. People will get used to hearing a beep, until it becomes part of the background that they don't hear it anymore. So yes, for a while you'll see fewer accidents, but I think in the long run it will backfire. Someone needs to put cell phone jammers in cars so that as long as the tires are moving, the cell phone won't work. I think that will do a lot more to reduce accidents than an autonomous car.

th******:

Here in the north, when it is snowing, edges of smaller roads become sometimes very hidden, and one must be careful not to drop off the edge or to drive on thick snow. I think it would be even harder for automatics to find where in the middle of reflective snow the road goes. On the other hand, in good conditions in areas with relatively stable weather, self-driving cars would help a lot. And in big warehouses they have successfully used robotic wagons to move stuff around for long time already. The problem is, you would have to remove all the people from roads to make it safe for self-driving cars, and get rid of the problem about who is responsible of what and who has to pay for who when something happens.

 

---

 

[Veritasium] We gathered comments about popular videos and looked at them in summary, including play time, and order of popularity.

It's a good video or channel, but if you're sad because it's too long, please leave a YouTube channel or video link and I'll post it on this blog.

 

---

 

[Veritasium] Channel Posting

[Veritasium] 10 Facts About Great White Sharks

[Veritasium] 13 Misconceptions About Global Warming

[Veritasium] 4가지 혁명적 수수께끼

[Veritasium] An Affordable 3D-Printed Arm

[Veritasium] Anti-Gravity Wheel Explained

[Veritasium] Anti-Gravity Wheel?

[Veritasium] Backspin Basketball Flies Off Dam

[Veritasium] Can Silence Actually Drive You Crazy?

[Veritasium] Can You Swim in Shade Balls?

[Veritasium] Does Planet 9 Exist?

[Veritasium] Drinking in ZERO-G! (and other challenges of a trip to Mars)

[Veritasium] First Flight on Another Planet!

[Veritasium] First Image of a Black Hole!

[Veritasium] How Does a Quantum Computer Work?

[Veritasium] How Special Relativity Makes Magnets Work

[Veritasium] How Were the Pyramids Built?

[Veritasium] I Waterproofed Myself With Aerogel!

[Veritasium] Is This What Quantum Mechanics Looks Like?

[Veritasium] Making Liquid Nitrogen From Scratch!

[Veritasium] Making SOLID Nitrogen!

[Veritasium] Quantum Entanglement & Spooky Action at a Distance

[Veritasium] Slinky Drop Answer

[Veritasium] Spinning Black Holes

[Veritasium] Supercooled Water - Explained!

[Veritasium] The Bayesian Trap

[Veritasium] The Illusion of Truth

[Veritasium] The Northernmost Town on Earth (Svalbard in 4K)

[Veritasium] The World in UV

[Veritasium] What's In A Candle Flame?

[Veritasium] Why Gravity is NOT a Force

[Veritasium] Why Machines That Bend Are Better

[Veritasium] Would You Take This Bet?

[Veritasium] Your Mass is NOT From the Higgs Boson

[Veritasium] 그림자의 가장 밝은 부분은 가운데입니다.

[Veritasium] 도대체 화씨란?

[Veritasium] 생각의 과학

[Veritasium] 온도에 대한 오해

[Veritasium] 왜 맹독성 동물들은 온대 기후에 살까?

[Veritasium] 외계인은 존재할까?

[Veritasium] 이중 슬릿 실험

[Veritasium] 임의적이지 않다는게 뭘까요?

[Veritasium] 카멜레온은 어떻게 색을 바꿀까?

[Veritasium] 파괴 불가능한 코팅!?

[Veritasium] 핵 미사일은 어떻게 발사하는가

 

---